If you have a sensitivity to a particular chemical and have taken the time and made the effort to inform those with whom you interact on a daily basis about this sensitivity, is it assault when they continue to use it openly (and often heavily) in a shared (poorly ventilated) environment?
If someone tells you they have severe food allergies and cannot have contact with any one of many common foods, several of which are favorites of yours, is it assault when you insist on adding it to their diet?
If you have made it very clear that the scents added to cleaning products, detergents, room deodorizers and perfumes make you cough blood, is it assault when coworkers who know insist on using or re-applying these items at their desks?
Are they assault? Or are these acts of battery? True, a can of Lysol may appear tame by comparison, but is it any less a weapon than a knife when used near a person with a porphyric sensitivity to the chemicals contained within that product?
Over the last several months my submissive has been subjected to a high level of stress by individuals of rank, status and prestige within the local community. My submissive has been fighting acute intermittent porphyria for many years, something he has shared with very few people because of general ignorance and lack of information of the disease. As a result of the stress of dealing with the hostility, lack of cooperation and dismissive attitudes, what once would have been a week-long flare-up of his porphyria has now lasted over 10 months. Truth be told, it is closer to a year if you look at the slowly escalating symptoms of August and September 2009.
I have been much more vocal about his situation than he, particularly with those I believed were simply acting out of ignorance in their communications with him. The damage from the biochemical imbalance, inadequately disclosed by his neurologist at the time but appearing for all intentions at the time as a series of strokes, had compromised his communication skills, damaged his “social filter,” and skewed his perceptions of others’ intent in their communications with him. This was all explained to those he perceived were baiting him, ridiculing him, or being dishonest with him in what he perceived as misleading, untruthful, or evasive online posts.
Continued communication was encouraged with these individuals on the grounds that my boy had shown improvement in his concentration, thought processes and communication abilities as a result of the give and take prompted by his inquiries. I went so far as to thank them for taking the time to answer his questions, as persistent as they were and as repetitious as they seemed, because it encouraged him to read his emails and respond to them after being unable to do so for many weeks.
PLEASE NOTE: Great effort is being made to preserve the anonymity of all of the parties involved in this situation, including but not exclusive to the names of any individuals, organizations and locations involved in or periphery to the situation. Any resemblence to actual persons or organizations is either purely coincidental, damned lucky, or the product of privileged information.
Some of those with whom the boy was conversing took it to heart and truly tried to engage him humanely and respectful of his position even if they did not agree with him. Others, however, seemed to take this information as an intelligence report on an insidious and much hated enemy. It was weaponized, exploited as a means for discrediting and demonizing a questioning voice and for shutting down discussions they did not want to have about a topic they did not want discussed in a forum.
The tone of the public discussions turned from one of mild annoyance and impatience to one of snarky, pointed, often sarcastic comments and veiled ridicule. Little jabs and provocative statements were made and directed at him and any who were seen as supportive of him. Attempts to defuse or redirect were met with defensiveness and often were restated in such a manner as to call attention to the boy’s difficulties or to victimize themselves.
What began as a mild disagreement last fall slowly built until early spring. At that point, like the crocus and the tulips in the last wisps of winter snow , it erupted from darkness and splashed across an already skittish membership. Dissent was punished. Loyalties were tested. Friendships were strained or slowly bled out of existence. Exchanges between the boy and those who were trusted to know better grew increasingly provocative and confrontational. The pressure on his system increased.
The boy’s porphyria attack worsened under the pressure and with it all of the resulting damage:
tremors,
neuropathy,
worsening of the encephalopathy,
visual and auditory hallucinations,
pain,
double vision,
impaired balance,
staggering,
loss of coordination,
increased loss of gross and fine motor skills,
loss of short-term memory,
confusion,
dizziness,
worsening ringing in the ears,
light sensitivity,
inability to concentrate for more than a few minutes at a time,
difficulty with speech,
nausea,
pain, pain and pain.
The list grew on, and as the list increased, his disease progressed and his physical and mental states worsened.
We did our best to defuse the situation, the girl and I. Good friends stood by us, pointed out the nakedness of the Emperors, and did their best to soften the tone of the rhetoric. We tried humor, only to see it reacted to as though we had launched an attack. We tried cool logic, only to have it pooh-poohed or twisted into something nearly unrecognizable. We even tried simply rising above it, one of the most difficult tactics for the boy, but to no avail.
Each time tactics changed, the stress level increased and symptoms worsened. The worsening symptoms increased the pain. The increased pain caused more problems with thought processes. The increase in intellectual difficulty caused difficulty communicating and increased frustration, which in turn caused misinterpretations of posts, poorly filtered responses, and fuel for the fire of those who delighted in provoking him and adding to his distress.
WORD OF CAUTION: Do Not allow yourself to be lured into a so-called Private Email Exchange for the purpose of having a mutual blow-up, burying the hatchet, then moving on. The likelihood that all will be forgiven and forgotten afterward is about as high as those for winning PowerBall, MegaMillions, the Massachusetts Lottery, and being stuck by lightning all in the same month. Even disclaimers and stated agreements to the contrary will not protect you from backhanded punitive actions.
Yes, at some point the boy and one of the Antagonists agreed to an exchange of emails, a private conversation which was to remain a private conversation, to enable the two of them to either work things out and come to some mutually acceptable arrangement or coexistence, or to provide a mutual outlet for an angry exchange that should have cleared the air. The Antagonist emailed that he would only do so if I were copied the full exchange, a condition to which I agreed.
What transpired was a unmittigated disaster. After what the boy and I felt was an agreement by the Antagonist to conduct this exchange confidentially, an agreement implied by his continued participation in this exchange, the Antagonist chose to use this exchange as yet another weapon against not only the boy, but apparently also against this old Mistress (one can only guess, as no official statement has been presented), for violations of the Antagonist’s safe space.
Broken down to it’s essentials, my boy, my collared submissive, was duped. I was also duped by an individual I had once trusted, respected, and included in a small cadre of individuals considered better than mere acquaintances. A very heated exchange, taken out of context both as a written document and as part of a much greater timeline, will now determine whether or not I and my household will be “permitted” to remain members of a social group or to attend its periodic events. It could also very well determine the health of our Lifestyle group, one which never competed with this social group but actually worked hard to grow the social group by referrals and suggestions to our membership and others.
In fact, when this situation first exploded across the monitors of individuals both interested and disinterested, a suspension was handed down from on high by the Antagonist, a second Antagonist, and their fellows, trusted individuals of rank, status and prestige within the local community. Both the boy and I were found guilty of violating the warm and fuzzy utopia that was the Antagonist’s universe and were thereby removed.
Had things ended then, we would have moved on and it is possible that the boy’s body and mind would have had an opportunity to heal without the additional stress and strain of contact with the Antagonist and his cadre of minions. We could have set to work scraping the blood and fecal matter off what remained of our reputations and immersed ourselves into developing the bylaws, membership and activities for our own group. In retrospect it truly would have been the best thing for all involved and uninvolved yet still affected, but as dictated by cliche, the best laid plans of mice and men, etc, it was not to be.
Against our wishes and my better judgement, persons not directly involved in the situation stepped forward and through methods only those involved should discuss forced the aforementioned Antagonists and trusted individuals of rank, status and prestige to select a disinterested and ethical committee of members to investigate all of the charges being lobbed about like incendiary grenades and to make a decision (or several decisions) based on their findings.
That, dear reader, was in April. Today it is Saturday, August 28th and at this point we have seen the following progress:
1.
2.
3.
My boy has finally resigned his membership in the local organization involved in his physical and mental torture and he did so very publicly.
My girl was attacked and impugned both in a group posting and further in an email by an individual, and we are still waiting for a decision from the committee on this extremely simple and incomplicated complaint.
The girl and I work hard every day to keep the boy as happy and free from stress or pain as we can. The illness progresses ever onward, sometimes slowly, sometimes more quickly, often in very unpredictable ways. He can be perfectly fine and laughing and and playing with the dog one minute, then curled up on the couch in the dark with tears in his eyes from the pain the next, and there is no way to know when these episodes will begin or end.
The Antagonists remain individuals of rank, status and prestige in the community, even to the point of expanding rank to include a leadership role in a local commercial venture geared to kinksters and fetishists.
Other individuals of rank, status and prestige in the committee have been and remain uncommunicative. One can imagine that they are doing their best to put forth a face of calm and unity without any taint of favoritism or familiarity. Or one can imagine any number of things.
Persons who have stood by us have found themselves subject to virus and bot attacks, forced to nonconsensually spam the world.
Others persons we have held as very dear have been pulled away from us by duty, by allegience, and even just by happenstance, and they are missed terribly.
There is still no course of treatment for my boy’s porphyria. The pain is often unrelenting, and all that can be done is make him comfortable and get him to his appointments. We wait for the day when someone looks up from behind a chart or laptop with a smile and a sparkle and tells us they have a miracle for my much loved submissive. It will never happen, but I can still dream.
We will know what we will know only when the time is right. Until then, it is all speculation and worth nothing beyond a moment’s entertainment. But one must still ask one’s self the initial question: are words on a page, words known to trigger a situation which provokes a profoundly negative response in someone’s health and well being, merely words on a page or are they an act of assault when used with a calloused disregard for the life of another?